If you want to make the argument that two-spacing is legit for monospaced fonts in text editors, great. I'll buy it. But to claim that because HTML and LaTex ex

If you want to make the argument that two-spacing is legit for monospaced fonts in text editors, great. I'll buy it. But to claim that because HTML and LaTex exist that source and presentation are orthogonal concerns flies in the face of the fact that most text is created in Microsoft Word or something like it. I don't know how many installs of Vim are out there, but I'm guessing it's less than the 500 million plus installs of Word. This is the kind of tech-geek pedantry that just pisses me off. Should content and presentation be separate concerns? Yes. Are they, for 95% of the world's population? Not even close. Which case should you optimize for?