What do you mean? The entire thing is conjecture. We just don't know if there was even an issue. It's possible that the two accidents were uncorrelated. It's po

What do you mean? The entire thing is conjecture. We just don't know if there was even an issue. It's possible that the two accidents were uncorrelated. It's possible that the software worked perfectly but the pilots made wrong decisions. It's possible that the software worked perfectly but pilots panicked because they were unaware of what was happening. It's possible the software was at fault .. and on and on ... He also claimed that there was a sensor problem. Are we sure about that? I have a hard time believing that a critical system would rely on one sensor to function properly. These things are built like space shuttles - with multiple redundancies and a fail-over strategy. At the end of the day, we just don't know. Smart people are trying to figure it out, and we'll get to the bottom of it. Let's just wait a bit. >Boeing sells an option package that includes an extra AoA vane, and an AoA disagree light, which lets pilots know that this problem was happening. Both 737MAXes that crashed were delivered without this option. No 737MAX with this option has ever crashed. Jesus. What an atrocious statement.