3 ms·
Boeing made the decision to maximize profits by retrofitting an older model. There’s nothing involuntary about it. They’ve released newer model planes that hav
by ctvo 8y ago
Boeing made the decision to maximize profits by retrofitting an older model. There’s nothing involuntary about it.
They’ve released newer model planes that have gone through the review process fine, correct?
- js2 8y agoFWIW, according to Wikipedia Boeing had intended to design a new plane but were forced into re-engineing the 737 by market forces: > In 2006, Boeing started considering the replacement of the 737 with a "clean-sheet" design that could follow the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.[12] In June 2010, a decision on this replacement was postponed into 2011.[13] > On December 1, 2010, Boeing's competitor, Airbus, launched the Airbus A320neo family to improve fuel burn and operating efficiency with new engines: the CFM International LEAP and Pratt & Whitney PW1000G.[14] In February 2011, Boeing's CEO Jim McNerney maintained "We're going to do a new airplane."[15] At the March 2011 ISTAT conference, BCA President James Albaugh was not sure about a 737 re-engine, like Boeing CFO James A. Bell stated at the JP Morgan Aviation, Transportation and Defense conference the same month.[16] The A320neo gathered 667 commitments at the June 2011 Paris Air Show for a backlog of 1,029 units since its launch, setting an order record for a new commercial airliner.[17] > On July 20, 2011, American Airlines announced an order for 460 narrowbody jets including 130 A320ceos and 130 A320neos, and intended to order 100 re-engined 737s with CFM LEAPs, pending Boeing confirmation.[18] The order broke Boeing's monopoly with the airline and forced Boeing into a re-engined 737. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX#Background https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX#Background