"condescending"? Was there a particular passage which you feel had the 'superior talking down to inferior' characteristic? Dialectical arguments tend to long

"condescending"? Was there a particular passage which you feel had the 'superior talking down to inferior' characteristic? Dialectical arguments tend to long, boring, and esoterical. I found the intro a mix of jocular and dialectical, which for me turned out to be the payoff for some of the article's repetitiveness.