Namedrops golang again.. seeing a pattern here. The claim that primitive types are better than interfaces (inside modules) reveals that he is comfortable with

Namedrops golang again.. seeing a pattern here. The claim that primitive types are better than interfaces (inside modules) reveals that he is comfortable with golang style. But this point misses that you can do _more_ things when you know the full concrete type of something, than when you program generically, only depending on the minimal requirements of what you need, which in turn opens up flexibility for the caller (constraints liberate). Of course, one doesn't think too hard about this in golang, lacking generics