4 ms·
Totally, I don't think even that it's possible being productive with Common Lisp using vim. Just don't fit in my mind. I use vim to edit my /etc/fstab and works
by lerax 8y ago
Totally, I don't think even that it's possible being productive with Common Lisp using vim. Just don't fit in my mind. I use vim to edit my /etc/fstab and works really wonderfully. But Common Lisp? D: maybe there is some magical stuff, unicorns plugins and so on...
- fiddlerwoaroof 8y agoI used slimv for a while and it worked pretty well. Now I use evil-mode.
- PuercoPop 8y agoGiven that wookie's author uses vim it is clearly possible. Another prominent lisper that uses vim is Steve Losh, they've even written their own swank equivalent based on nrepl, cl-nrepl https://github.com/sjl/cl-nrepl https://github.com/sjl/cl-nrepl
- ambulancechaser 8y agoI use emacs for Clojure but I've got two amazingly productive coworkers who use neovim. It is a non-issue for them.
- nils-m-holm 8y agoI'm using vi (not even vim) for Scheme and some obscure LISP dialects and I indent my code manually. The magic is in LISP itself, no plugins required! :)
- Insanity 8y agoWhenever I wrote Common Lisp, I used vim + tmux + rlwrap & sbcl. I didn't find it to be a hindrance, but I've never done really complex things with CL either. YMMV :)