5 ms·

why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both si

why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both sides.

jimmy1 8y ago
Exactly. Someone with currently no political home what-so-ever, anyone else here that thinks otherwise needs to take a step back and evaluate the extremism that has taken over both sides.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
cowpig 8y ago
"Angry" is the facebook reaction. Dividing the world into two "sides" isn't good for us. I don't think the world of political discourse is really divided into two "sides" as you imply, despite that being useful for media that make money from making people angry.
- SlowRobotAhead 8y ago
  I’m open minded to what you are saying - but if you don’t think there are “sides” or at least someone has a strong interest in promoting that idea - it may because you are too firmly planted in one side yourself. I agree with GP, as someone with no clear cut political ideology, it’s obvious that wedge issues are formed and selected to fit divisions. See no further than almost every establishment Democrat having talked about border security for years, even building a wall in comments, now voting against anything border related because “their side” has adopted that Trump wants border security so they must be fully against it. [0] [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISMNv3qm8M&app=desktop https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISMNv3qm8M&app=desktop (just picked a “Democrat for Wall” result, my personal opinions on that completely aside. You could pick any wedge issue and find a more reasonable time for it)
abathur 8y ago
I think they are just counting the "reaction" of the users with the content, and suggesting there are a greater portion of people picking the "angry" reaction on the Fox News articles.
teddyh 8y ago
“Angry” is the new “Dark”.

why is fox news “angry” yet i’m sure feeds full of aoc and black lives matter would be considered woke. Biased article. The anger is very prevalent with both sides.

jimmy1 8y ago

Exactly. Someone with currently no political home what-so-ever, anyone else here that thinks otherwise needs to take a step back and evaluate the extremism that has taken over both sides.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

cowpig 8y ago

"Angry" is the facebook reaction. Dividing the world into two "sides" isn't good for us. I don't think the world of political discourse is really divided into two "sides" as you imply, despite that being useful for media that make money from making people angry.

SlowRobotAhead 8y ago
I’m open minded to what you are saying - but if you don’t think there are “sides” or at least someone has a strong interest in promoting that idea - it may because you are too firmly planted in one side yourself. I agree with GP, as someone with no clear cut political ideology, it’s obvious that wedge issues are formed and selected to fit divisions. See no further than almost every establishment Democrat having talked about border security for years, even building a wall in comments, now voting against anything border related because “their side” has adopted that Trump wants border security so they must be fully against it. [0] [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISMNv3qm8M&app=desktop https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gISMNv3qm8M&app=desktop (just picked a “Democrat for Wall” result, my personal opinions on that completely aside. You could pick any wedge issue and find a more reasonable time for it)

abathur 8y ago

I think they are just counting the "reaction" of the users with the content, and suggesting there are a greater portion of people picking the "angry" reaction on the Fox News articles.

teddyh 8y ago

“Angry” is the new “Dark”.