The edits to most popular pages will be most scrutinized. Obama's and Trump's talk pages have the most revisions out of all Wikipedia articles [1] and are secon

The edits to most popular pages will be most scrutinized. Obama's and Trump's talk pages have the most revisions out of all Wikipedia articles [1] and are second and third most viewed [2], so they are the hardest articles to edit in a way that won't have hundreds of eyes on them right away. The Wikimedia Foundation gets $100 mil in revenue per year and having these two pages look non-neutral would be awful for their fundraising. I think it's just that extremely high interest => usually high quality and polarizing topics have lower quality than average. The consensus was never established on some quite popular controversial articles e.g. [3] and this is heavily criticized by one side of the argument [4]. [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Pages_with_the_most_revisions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Pag... [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Multiyear_ranking_of_most_viewed_pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Multiyear_ranking_of... [3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_controversy [4]https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/9l30zj/how_i_joined_gamergate_a_wikipedia_gatekeeping/ https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/9l30zj/how_...