3 ms·
There is something I've always struggled to understand... Forget tech for a second. In any job type, isn't it a pyramid. There are lots of junior roles, slight
by SimonPStevens 8y ago
There is something I've always struggled to understand...
Forget tech for a second. In any job type, isn't it a pyramid. There are lots of junior roles, slightly fewer senior roles, fewer again manager roles, only a few senior manager roles etc. Isn't that just a natural part of any team's makeup. You only need one leader for a team of 5-10 people, etc. I've witnessed this team structure at every single company I've worked for (and as a contractor for 10 years, that is a lot), if you want to progress up to the next level there are always fewer jobs available.
Doesn't that mean that as you get older, competition for the job at a seniority that matches your age become increasingly difficult. The number of people doesn't change.
Not everyone can progress up the ladder when the ladder narrows as you go.
This isn't ageism is it? It's just the natural lower demand for more senior people.
And I guess what follows from this is the people who fail to move up, and try to stay at their current level are then also competing with the people below them who are trying to move up.
- gowld 8y agoThe ageism comes in when employers prefer younger people because of "trajectory" and "potential", since as you note, most of those young people will not show trajectory or useable-to-the-employer potential. What's not ageism is that employers refuse to pay higher wages for people with years of experience that the employer decides are not more useful than the lower experience of younger/newer people.