3 ms·
Ah, I knew this rang a bell. Reflecting on this a second time, I wonder whether it is possible to interpret this as the universe not caring until the informati
by hyperion2010 8y ago
Ah, I knew this rang a bell.
Reflecting on this a second time, I wonder whether it is possible to interpret this as the universe not caring until the information interacting actually matters. For example, if someone tells me that they have measured a value, they could very well be lying, and until I say "prove it, what value did you measure?" the underlying implementation of the universe is in a superposition where they both did and didn't measure the value (where the friend is telling the truth vs lying).
- ikeboy 8y agoThe theoretical possibility of someone lying to you isn't quantum-based and doesn't work as a superposition. If they generated a random bit and lied depending on that value, then it would be.
- erydo 8y agoI am even more of a layman than most here, but — why is it different? Isn't that basically Schrödinger's cat?