4 ms·
>It’s not all of California. It’s just in the places with their own higher minimum wage like SF or LA. I’ve seen it a bunch of times, mostly at small family own
by dontbenebby 8y ago
>It’s not all of California. It’s just in the places with their own higher minimum wage like SF or LA. I’ve seen it a bunch of times, mostly at small family owned restaurants.
if the menu lists a price for a dish, how is it legal to tack on an extra 3% because the owner doesn't like the minimum wage in SF?
- midnightclubbed 8y agoIn San Diego the surcharges were deemed legal: https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/restaurants/sd-fi-restaurant-surcharges-legal-court-20190131-story.html https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/restaurants/sd...
- wutbrodo 8y agoYea I've always wondered that. It's supposed to be included in prices (unlike sales taxes) like any other cost, so how are they able to legally get away with advertising a lower cost than they charge? Would it be similar (from a legal perspective) if they added an electricity surcharge or a dishwashing surcharge and lowered their menu prices accordingly? I'm all for more transparency of taxes for the end-payer, but I'm curious about this from a legal perspective.
- dontbenebby 8y agoSomeone replied with an article that they were legal, but that article mentioned the surcharge must be disclosed prior to ordering. I suspect there's wiggle room for a good lawyer if they're using mouseprint or not making sure ordering services like Grubhub accurately disclose the charge.