> So, if I understand correctly, this means that by banning all pornography in the name of preventing child porn, they'll actually be harming efforts on this un

> So, if I understand correctly, this means that by banning all pornography in the name of preventing child porn, they'll actually be harming efforts on this uncovering of child pornography networks effort. This is unfortunate. Unfortunate, and also wholly predictable. This was exactly why advocacy groups of former victims of sex trafficking opposed SESTA in the first place, as did even the DOJ: they both recognized that it would ultimately make it harder to identify and rescue victims of sex trafficking.