Again, science, not politics or propaganda. Listen to what he actually said. He knows his sample size was small, he knows he couldn't make any absolute conclus

Again, science, not politics or propaganda. Listen to what he actually said. He knows his sample size was small, he knows he couldn't make any absolute conclusions at the beginning. He simply found something unexpected and reported on it. I would challenge you to read his papers, go to youtube and watch a presentation of his and see what he actually says, not repeat accusations from others against him. I think you will be surprised that he doesn't believe/teach most of what people accuse him of. Edit: Merck caught lying about their measles vaccines. (an actual lawsuit from 2 virologists, the court papers are linked in the article) https://www.courthousenews.com/Class-Says-Merck-Lied-About-Mumps-Vaccine/ https://www.courthousenews.com/Class-Says-Merck-Lied-About-M...