3 ms·
> Extraordinary claims, require extraordinary proof, I don’t even see a README. Im confused. The link points to Github which literally shows the README on the
by chacham15 8y ago
> Extraordinary claims, require extraordinary proof, I don’t even see a README.
Im confused. The link points to Github which literally shows the README on the front page.
> Is the resolution 64x64 or 1028x1028
From the readme: cnn (CPU, 128x96) 2.35ms 425.95 0.64ms 1562.10
> 1500FPS on what hardware
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.6GHz.
I could go on, but literally the answers to your questions are in the README that you somehow didnt see.
- lettergram 8y agoFor reference, just saying the CPU isn’t exactly what I meant. However, I do see some of it’s there. What I’m pointing out is that generally this is a very loose claim. 1500FPS is for a very specific problem, on a rig that is still not defined, using images that are similarly not defined. What’s the RAM, IO speed, what type of images, etc. Comparing to other methods on the same rig solves that. Again, I see your point, but I was generally pointing out that the analysis or claims of this nature are not clean or clear.