3 ms·
In the spirit of science, I suggest you actually listen to what Wakefield says from his own mouth. A few points most people don't know: 1. He wasn't against v
by RobertRoberts 8y ago
In the spirit of science, I suggest you actually listen to what Wakefield says from his own mouth.
A few points most people don't know:
1. He wasn't against vaccines.
2. He found a "correlation" between gut inflammation and autism.
3. His paper in the 90s didn't say vaccines caused autism. (that I recall reading anyway)
- ReptileMan 8y agoHe was shopping for lawsuit and he used shady laboratories IIRC. So he knew he wasn't doing proper science.
- RobertRoberts 8y agoAgain, science, not politics or propaganda. Listen to what he actually said. He knows his sample size was small, he knows he couldn't make any absolute conclusions at the beginning. He simply found something unexpected and reported on it. I would challenge you to read his papers, go to youtube and watch a presentation of his and see what he actually says, not repeat accusations from others against him. I think you will be surprised that he doesn't believe/teach most of what people accuse him of. Edit: Merck caught lying about their measles vaccines. (an actual lawsuit from 2 virologists, the court papers are linked in the article) https://www.courthousenews.com/Class-Says-Merck-Lied-About-Mumps-Vaccine/ https://www.courthousenews.com/Class-Says-Merck-Lied-About-M...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]