3 ms·
Because the community of contributors has on multiple occasions strongly objected to advertising, on several occasions resulting in fracturing. In 2002 when th
by ig1 16y ago
Because the community of contributors has on multiple occasions strongly objected to advertising, on several occasions resulting in fracturing.
In 2002 when the idea of banners ads was seriously raised the majority of the Spanish Wikipedia contributors forked and started Enciclopedia Libre, despite the fact that Wikipedia decided not to go ahead with adverts it took two years to attract enough contributors back to rival the forked site. That's not an experience the Wikipedia community want to repeat.
Back in 2004 I proposed that Wikipedia made opt-in ads so people who wanted to support Wikipedia by watching ads could do so, but there wasn't enough support for the idea to gain traction.
- corin_ 16y agoAnd you have the winning answer to my question. Thanks :)
- cabalamat 16y agoFurthermore, if they did take advertising it would generate a lot of revenue, enough that the Wikimedia foundation would then spend all its time arguing what to do with it.
- rmc 16y agoThey they should only have ads on for X days out of the year. Adjust X depending on how much money you get from ads and how much money you need.