tbh, having read the draft, I am still not clear whether running a node/the browser is to be made illegal. that's what the Zeit article says, too: the worst in

tbh, having read the draft, I am still not clear whether running a node/the browser is to be made illegal. that's what the Zeit article says, too: the worst interpretation is, yes it will be made illegal. another, more benevolent reading is that there should be harder punishments for providing a concrete platform for illegal activities. so how can you make a draft that is so vague? make no mistake, this is not incompetency. as per Zeit, and I agree, this is intentional to scare those who run the browser/a node. also, consider Günter Krings' proposal to make the entire 'dark web' illegal. his reasoning: that an open democracy has no need for such a structure. so, because germany is an 'open democracy', he thinks germany can abolish the open internet altogether? eidt: word.