3 ms·
Both crashes happened outside the FAA's sphere. I don't see how we can blame them for foreign pilots not being trained well enough.
by partiallypro 8y ago
Both crashes happened outside the FAA's sphere. I don't see how we can blame them for foreign pilots not being trained well enough.
- close04 8y agoFAA is not responsible for the crashes but for not taking any precautionary measure in the US even with reports as the one linked above coming in. Their role isn't just reactive but also proactive. The report above is coming from a US pilot: > State Reference : US > B737 MAX First Officer reported feeling unprepared for first flight in the MAX, citing inadequate training. From another comment below (a simulator industry insider): > However, since the 737ng and 737 MAX are common type (meaning that in the eyes of the authorities, if you're licensed for one, you're licensed for both) customers aren't REQUIRED to get a 737 MAX sim granted that they already have a 737ng sim. This is where the FAA could have intervened. Pilots consider them different enough to warrant training so it should have been clear for the FAA too. But they accept this compromise to allow companies to cut costs. And the scary thing is that a new pilot will also get to train on an old NG sim before flying a (different) MAX plane. Unlike experience pilots, a new one would have little flying experience to fall back on and the FAA allows them to fly a plane after being trained on what might as well be a sim for a different plane.