3 ms·
That the system is driven by donations is true, but misleading -- the maximum amount that any person or PAC can donate to a candidate is $5000. Only by acting
by andrewla 8y ago
That the system is driven by donations is true, but misleading -- the maximum amount that any person or PAC can donate to a candidate is $5000.
Only by acting collectively can this sort of thing make a difference. Large organizations like the National Rifle Associations have influence not because they can bribe politicians through donations, but because their large membership means that an endorsement or condemnation from that organization can cause the members to act individually in support of or against a politician.
For that matter, political parties in the United States are really no more than giant PAC in themselves -- they help candidates by narrowing their field of support to a single candidate in elections and by helping them get the signatures necessary to get on the ballots (which are technically open to anyone, not just those affiliated with a party), in exchange for which members of the party are expected, to some degree, to support party-line initiatives.
- darksaints 8y ago> the maximum amount that any person or PAC can donate to a candidate is $5000. This is not true for super PACs. Their only restriction is that they can't coordinate directly with a candidate. This is problematic because it is incredibly simple to coordinate directly but hide your tracks, and it's also incredibly simple to coordinate indirectly.
- indigochill 8y ago>the maximum amount that any person or PAC can donate to a candidate is $5000. Where are these contribution numbers coming from, then? http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=B http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=B
- andrewla 8y agoMy understanding is that those numbers include any donations from individuals who work for Amazon in any capacity.