4 ms·
it's 2 people, so they've gotta be two people who were caught on their screens flaunting the rules or being ignorant of it. If it was network surveilance, you'd
by winningcontinue 8y ago
it's 2 people, so they've gotta be two people who were caught on their screens flaunting the rules or being ignorant of it. If it was network surveilance, you'd have numbers in the thousands easily.
- viraptor 8y agoI've seen some are mentioned as caught on the street. Just wondering about the rest where the situation was not listed explicitly. > If it was network surveilance, you'd have numbers in the thousands easily. That doesn't have to be true. If you want fewer people playing the game, it's easier/cheaper to catch a small number and make it known in media than actually arrest thousands. (Unless arrests are your goal that is)
- winningcontinue 8y agoThat's not how you control the behavior of a population. You'd post the entire number of people caught, warn the violators and make them pay a small indemnity. Having a small number of people reported caught makes enforcement seem ineffective in finding the culprits.