Hmmm. So this is actual story. I read the guardian reporting and it was very clearly leaving out details, because the questions being asked contained specific d

Hmmm. So this is actual story. I read the guardian reporting and it was very clearly leaving out details, because the questions being asked contained specific details which the answers simply ignored. But similar to the Pell case, with international media outlets, under different laws and protocols, it just seems to constrain certain media organisations from discussing the facts as they are known.