3 ms·
Honest question, why are people being so aggressive about saying that the human aspects should be considered first and foremost? If there was no problem with th
by ironmagma 8y ago
Honest question, why are people being so aggressive about saying that the human aspects should be considered first and foremost? If there was no problem with the aircraft, that would surely lead us to the conclusion that it was a training/pilot problem anyway. What's the point of pushing the human narrative so hard?
- robjan 8y agoI have a feeling that people wouldn't be pushing the human/airline aspect quite so much if both of the aforementioned were American or "Western"
- jarfil 8y agoThis kind of accident doesn't happen for just a single reason, they happen for a SERIES of reasons all together. Some of those reasons are technical, some are environmental, and some are human factor. Blaming any single of them is bullshit... and so is forgetting about any of them.
- rahkiin 8y ago1) boeing changing geometry 2) boeing adding a new system that takes over control without documenting 3) pushing very hard to classify a new plane as an older type so now retraining happens 4) using only 2 sensors instead of 3, and using just one to control parts of the plane. A series of reasons
- jquery 8y agoOh so the NTSB report is out? Can you link it? Thanks.