> Are you arguing that they failed through incompetence, or that they were lying/exaggerating as an excuse to ban all pornography for other reasons? Yes, SESTA

> Are you arguing that they failed through incompetence, or that they were lying/exaggerating as an excuse to ban all pornography for other reasons? Yes, SESTA was the real reason that they banned pornography. SESTA imposed way too much liability on them to be able to support it. It had nothing to do with child porn. They are still liable for child porn. They still have to work with NCMEC and go through the same process for identifying, reporting, and removing child porn. None of that has changed.