> Yet you seem to make it sound like it's FB's fault. I judge Facebook by its actions and the intent of the Free Basics program is clearly shady, I was respon

> Yet you seem to make it sound like it's FB's fault. I judge Facebook by its actions and the intent of the Free Basics program is clearly shady, I was responding to a parent who was presenting it as a god thing full stop, so am simply pointing out that there is more to FB's motivation here. > Social network has enormous benefit because we human being are social animal. Simple as that. I was talking more about the various free data deals Facebook has set up in developing countries, which effectively make it so that a lot of people see only Facebook when they first get online. I was not talking about "social networks" as a concept being bad. > I'm surprised that you only "understand somewhat why it's working". Just because there are bad sides of it doesn't make it a mistake. I understand it has short-term benefits, however over the long term, do you really want billions of people to assume that Facebook is the internet, to have everything they ever said, every picture ever taken stored there? Maybe even more, considering a lot of them are unlikely to have access to timely information on internet privacy, given they're pretty much limited to FB, a party not known for its strong stance on such matters? And how about startups from the very countries affected? You're hardly going to compete against FB in such a situation. > Condemn FB for their shady tactics, but don't forget the positive effect. I am doing precisely that; condemning shady tactics. The benefits of FB are achievable without these tactics, or even without FB itself for that matter.