4 ms·
Wireless is slower, has higher latency, is less reliable This all varies based on the wireless tech used. My apartment in Seattle is serviced via point to poin
by subway 8y ago
Wireless is slower, has higher latency, is less reliable
This all varies based on the wireless tech used. My apartment in Seattle is serviced via point to point wireless with another building across the neighborhood. Currently I see under 2ms RTT to google.com, and can max out the 100mbit port on my router both up and down. (Gigabit is available, but requires an account with WaveG. 100mbit is free with my rent, and on the landlord's account).
Aside from a misconfiguration on my building's switch that allowed a neighbor to act as a rogue dhcp server, I've yet to see an outage in the two years of living here.
Wireless doesn't have to suck.
- AnthonyMouse 8y agoYou're describing the thing that requires you to have many towers each serving a small number of users. Moreover, the reliability you get has a lot to do with what happens in your neighborhood. Point to point wireless is great until somebody builds a new building in the path between you and the other wireless device.