3 ms·
Like I said, a decentralized system can fail, but the root cause of such a failure cannot be "configuration change". If a configuration change is sufficient to
by gambler 8y ago
Like I said, a decentralized system can fail, but the root cause of such a failure cannot be "configuration change". If a configuration change is sufficient to break your system then it's not truly decentralized.
Let's take your car example.
If you update your car's firmware and get in an accident, it's not a system-level failure.
If manufacturer sends a wireless update and all their autonomous cars start to bump into one another, it's not really a decentralized system anymore - updates are centralized.
If you update your car, it crashes, sends a wireless signal that affects another car, and it crashes and so on... This is an example of a cascading failure in a fully decentralized system, but the real root cause would be cars interfering with one another, not your firmware update.
- uluyol 8y agoIf a manufacturer with 10 percent market share sends out an update that causes their vehicles to suddenly turn right, that would ruin conditions for everyone.
- matt_kantor 8y agoIf that's the case, then the conclusion based on the upthread reasoning is that this system isn't decentralized enough when any single manufacturer has a 10 percent market share.