> how does the current system, or any voting system, prevent coercion? By only allowing you alone into the voting booth, not allowing you to show your ballot t

> how does the current system, or any voting system, prevent coercion? By only allowing you alone into the voting booth, not allowing you to show your ballot to anyone, collecting the ballots in a sealed ballot box that's located in public that anonymizes the votes > Even if votes aren't all logged, you can still be tortured for the answer. No, you can't if there is no way for you to prove how you voted. > I would much rather the country have an individual coercion problem than a mass voting fraud problem. Why would one have anything to do with the other? Also, one way to keep a country free from individual coercion problems is by having a reliable election process.