4 ms·
Hanlon's razor doesn't apply here. No one is implying that anyone at Boeing allowed this to happen due to malice, that would be truly insane. Negligence perpet
by wefarrell 8y ago
Hanlon's razor doesn't apply here. No one is implying that anyone at Boeing allowed this to happen due to malice, that would be truly insane.
Negligence perpetuated by greed is far more likely and equally as criminal.
- rkangel 8y agoIn this case I mean it as 'active' vs 'passive'. There is the implication in the article that Boeing purposefully went and stole springs that could be used to diagnose an issue that they were fully aware of. That I would describe as 'active' and I have trouble believing. Didn't put credence, time and effort into reports because they were inconvenient I would describe as 'passive'. Passive is still bad - likely results in the same number of people dying, but a different interpretation of the situation.