3 ms·
I'm fine with saying "top twenty candidates". And I like the idea of splitting it into two debates and randomly selecting who goes where, rather than the "kiddi
by beat 8y ago
I'm fine with saying "top twenty candidates". And I like the idea of splitting it into two debates and randomly selecting who goes where, rather than the "kiddie table" nonsense the GOP did with their large field in 2015.
- arcticfox 8y agoAs a detractor of many of the "kiddie table" participants in 2015, I did have some schadenfreude at the whole situation at least, so there was that redeeming quality. But no candidate really deserves to be treated that way, so I also like the idea of randomly splitting.