3 ms·
Did you read the update on Go 1.9? It is on par, I tried the benchmark on my machine why not try it yourself instead of downvoting?
by innagadadavida 8y ago
Did you read the update on Go 1.9? It is on par, I tried the benchmark on my machine why not try it yourself instead of downvoting?
- shaklee3 8y agoYou aren't reading it correctly. The OP was saying it's not fair unless you compare against an unordered map. The update is referring to an ordered map which is much slower than an unordered. The GO math implementation, which is an unordered map, is still significantly slower than the C++ unordered map.
- detaro 8y agoNo, it's fairly clear that the update refers to the unordered maps case.