2 ms·
Judges use historical cases as guidance. To say there is no precedent is misguided. This would still be the case. More importantly, judges do not pass legislat
by hodder 8y ago
Judges use historical cases as guidance. To say there is no precedent is misguided. This would still be the case.
More importantly, judges do not pass legislation. They adjudicate law.
- drjesusphd 8y agoCan you name a similar breach that happened in the past and was adjudicated by the court? If not, there is no judicial precedent, by definition.