3 ms·
new developments are in 3000 sq ft lots and have 2400-2600 sq ft built area I'd like to see your source for these figures. 400 sqft doesn't even meet setback r
by hanging 8y ago
new developments are in 3000 sq ft lots and have 2400-2600 sq ft built area
I'd like to see your source for these figures. 400 sqft doesn't even meet setback requirements for a 3000 sqft lot in any Bay Area city I'm aware of.
Likewise, that initial 20% by area (2000 of 10,000sqft) structure dimension ratio sounds made up.
- jelliclesfarm 8y agoFirst hand accounts re older properties. All Bay Area cities have to follow mandatory orders for building quotas from a Bay Area organization called ABAG. They advocate high density new developments. Re newer developments, here is an example: https://www.lennar.com/new-homes/california/san-francisco-bay-area/fremont/innovation https://www.lennar.com/new-homes/california/san-francisco-ba... : plan 5, icona. Three stories, 2300 sq ft built area approximately. 1.2ish million. On a related note, I browsed that random google link and clicked on ‘home automation’..basically it’s an Amazon home. Alexa would run your household. I am not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing.
- hanging 8y agoAll Bay Area cities have to follow mandatory orders for building quotas from a Bay Area organization called ABAG No, ABAG has no authority that supersedes any city or planning commission. First hand accounts re older properties ... is a crock. Older properties tend to have even smaller building footprint/ total parcel area ratios. How about one example of any parcel with a residence footprint taking 80% of the parcel area? As or that Lennar development, you are totally ignoring common area (exclusive and nonexclusive use).