4 ms·
> not that they were less effective, but that they couldn't prove efficacy Could you explain the difference?
by logifail 8y ago
> not that they were less effective, but that they couldn't prove efficacy
Could you explain the difference?
- btilly 8y agoTo prove efficacy, you have to have a statistically significant win. If you're ahead by a small margin, it isn't evidence that you're less effective. But you did not prove efficacy.