> even Python with a naive implementation is good enough. There is nothing naive about their implementation. 1) It uses C FFI (as many low level python functio

> even Python with a naive implementation is good enough. There is nothing naive about their implementation. 1) It uses C FFI (as many low level python functions do) 2) It uses a suboptimal but still not naive algo. Just because it isnt identical in implementation to the other languages doesn't mean its much simpler. Its fast because enough people cared to make it that way - it wasn't by some accident