I usually like Bloomberg, it's one of my favorite news sources but this article seems way off. They begin by talking about Martin Tripp's story (without any re

I usually like Bloomberg, it's one of my favorite news sources but this article seems way off. They begin by talking about Martin Tripp's story (without any real details of what exactly happened), then they move to some random security guard with claims of sex and drugs in the factory, then they jump back to Tripp's story again and it takes a while for the article to get to the real point of Tripp's story which is: > "While Gouthro was trying to address the sex, drugs, and raucous disorganization, Tripp decided to go public. He had access to Tesla’s internal production database and dug into it to figure out just how much material was being wasted. He decided to go to Lopez, who’d written about Tesla for Business Insider, emailing and texting her numbers showing wasted material and pictures of battery parts that he said could catch fire. > Tripp hoped that when Lopez’s story came out, Tesla would be forced to make the changes he’d suggested." So he actually leaked information. I'm not a Tesla defender but it feels like Bloomberg is trying really hard to portrait Tesla in the worst possible picture here.