3 ms·
The text mentions that kirby was open source, but it actually is not: https://getkirby.com/license https://getkirby.com/license (I really like tha approach of
by ximm 8y ago
The text mentions that kirby was open source, but it actually is not:
https://getkirby.com/license https://getkirby.com/license
(I really like tha approach of kirby though)
- jamesgeck0 8y agoKirby is open source with a restrictive license. https://github.com/getkirby/kirby https://github.com/getkirby/kirby Situations like this are why the FSF makes a big deal about distinguishing between the terms "open source" and "free software."
- dublinben 8y agoOpen Source has a definition[0], which this doesn't fit. The definitions of Open Source and Free Software are actually remarkably similar, and they significantly overlap. Software like this is known as "source available" because you can read it, but you're not allowed to use it freely. [0] https://opensource.org/osd https://opensource.org/osd