3 ms·
> When you discover that some "race" is underrepresented in some field, it's completely possible that a major cause is that the median in that arbitrarily defin
by nathan_long 8y ago
> When you discover that some "race" is underrepresented in some field, it's completely possible that a major cause is that the median in that arbitrarily defined racial category is below the median in another arbitrarily defined racial category.
It's possible, yes. It's also possible that perceptions of race influence the subjective decisions that drive those outcomes. How would you determine causality?
Eg, you could try sending employers identical resumes with "black sounding" and "white sounding" names and measuring callback rates. This has been done: https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/mar/15/jalen-ross/black-name-resume-50-percent-less-likely-get-respo/ https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/mar/15...).
There are likely many factors in racial disparities, but this appears to be one of them.
- AnthonyMouse 8y agohttps://www.reddit.com/r/TiADiscussion/comments/5na1fr/that_study_claiming_resumes_with_black_sounding/ https://www.reddit.com/r/TiADiscussion/comments/5na1fr/that_... https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bias-hiring-0504-biz-20160503-story.html https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bias-hiring-0504-... TL;DR: Original study used names that coded for socioeconomic status as well as race, and is older so people may have been more racist then than they are today. Newer study using names that ostensibly code for race and gender but not socioeconomic status shows no difference between race or gender coded names.