3 ms·
I've read it and I think it's way overblown. All I care about is solid support for standards and Chrome shines it that. I picked them because I could test if y
by kowdermeister 8y ago
I've read it and I think it's way overblown. All I care about is solid support for standards and Chrome shines it that.
I picked them because I could test if you actually experienced it. Chrome at the moment is the best we have but it does come with strings attached. It has different problems indeed, surprise surprise, however I don't think that's that a big issue at all.
- close04 8y ago> All I care about [...] You should have started with that instead of the jab. Not only would it have been clear that it’s a personal opinion not a matter of fact (Chrome is better for me) but it would have also saved you the time of coming back later with the real single biggest issue of IE: standards. The issues Chrome pose for most people right now are real. You don’t care about them for your personal reasons but disqualifying them because they’re not yours is very dismissive. You never know when your interests change.
- DCoder 8y ago> All I care about is solid support for standards and Chrome shines it that. Except for cases when it doesn't feel like supporting the standard in question, or it claims their support is sufficient. A recent example could be support for <input autocomplete="..."> [0]. [0]: https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ar1qj1//egl52wk/?context=1 https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ar1qj1//egl52w...