4 ms·
First, I generally prefer if people do not have a proof that I sent the email. Second, I'd be worried that someone stole my private keys and impersonated me in
by jonathanstrange 8y ago
First, I generally prefer if people do not have a proof that I sent the email. Second, I'd be worried that someone stole my private keys and impersonated me in those cases when signing makes sense. Endpoint security is almost nonexistent with current PCs, no matter how hard you try to harden your system. In the end, the risk of being impersonated for malicious purposes outweighs the advantages of signing.
- hopler 8y agoProof is good for you, as it protects you from friendly recipients from following instructions that hurt you from imposters. If you want to deny your own actual actions to an unfriendly recipient, refusing to sign your emails won't help. It's not symmetric.