4 ms·
That sounds like it could be an issue if illegal content is accidentally accepted, the owner of the repository would have to continue to share it and users migh
by zaarn 8y ago
That sounds like it could be an issue if illegal content is accidentally accepted, the owner of the repository would have to continue to share it and users might be at risk of downloading it, even if they don't see it.
That plus moderation tools couldn't cut down on people trying to bloat the repository.
- sneak 8y agoI think the same “problem” exists with GitHub, and the same solution exists here: the repo owner/ipns keyholder can rewrite history at will. Redacting information from the authoritative copy is possible.
- djsumdog 8y agoWell with traditional git, you can use tools like BFG and remove files or rewrite history that might have accidentally contained a password or API key (sure you can change them, but it's also best to get rid of them in history). Since this is on top of IPFS, is that still possible, or are there cases where things will last forever?