3 ms·
SPF can be a massive hassle since it's based on which server is sending emails, rather than which organisation is sending emails. Change some server and your SP
by Carpetsmoker 8y ago
SPF can be a massive hassle since it's based on which server is sending emails, rather than which organisation is sending emails. Change some server and your SPF breaks. In a large organisations there can be a bunch of different ways of sending emails (main app uses SendGrid, marketing team uses SureyMonkey, some 3rdparty tool uses something else, etc.) In practice, I see administrators get SPF wrong all the time, which is why it's rare to see a hard-reject policy.
In addition, the limitations of DKIM also apply to SPF:
> DKIM is useful, but limited. All it does is verify that an email which claims to be from paypal.com is really from paypal.com. What it lacks is the ability to show warnings such as “this email wasn’t signed, do you want to trust it?” and “this signature isn’t recognized, yikes!”
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jhasse 8y ago> What it lacks is the ability to show warnings such as “this email wasn’t signed, do you want to trust it?” and “this signature isn’t recognized, yikes!” Such a warning already exists: https://lifehacker.com/stop-looking-like-a-phisher-in-gmail-5875549 https://lifehacker.com/stop-looking-like-a-phisher-in-gmail-...