5 ms·
That's exactly the thing. There is no data to the contrary. You can't prove that the FAA is wrong, because we don't know why both planes crashed. We have assum
by arnon 8y ago
That's exactly the thing. There is no data to the contrary.
You can't prove that the FAA is wrong, because we don't know why both planes crashed.
We have assumptions, and there's a public perception - but it may not be correct.
- paganel 8y ago> You can't prove that the FAA is wrong, because we don't know why both planes crashed. From an outsider's perspective is the FAA's task to prove that both those crashes were unrelated to each other, because for a very safe industry like aviation a slight correlation (two almost identical planes crashed in a span of 6 months in clear-weather conditions) is often times seen as causation by most of the people directly involved: potential customers, the general public that helps pay the taxes that keep both Boeing and Airbus making airplanes etc.
- lagadu 8y agoBut we do have data: two airplanes of the exact same model crashed within less than 6 months, sure maybe that's just an outlier and not indicative of poor safety but at this point it falls on them to prove that.