> 25X is the difference between surviving a commute on a bicycle vs a car Meaningless and misleading comparison at best. According to numbers released by Boei

> 25X is the difference between surviving a commute on a bicycle vs a car Meaningless and misleading comparison at best. According to numbers released by Boeing [1] itself, the original 737 designed back in 1967 had a hull loss of 1.75 per million flights, the 737 NG designed in the late 1990s to early 2000s had a hull loss rate of 0.27 per million flights. So Boeing 737 had a 7X less likelihood to crash as the results of 30 years of improvements. 25X difference is going to send the highly unsafe 737 MAX design back to the WWII level. Now think again whether WWII era aircrafts with similar crash likelihood should be allowed to carry passengers in huge volume in 2019. You number proves one thing and one thing only - FAA has the legal and moral obligations to ground all those highly dangerous 737 MAX immediately. [1] http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_bca/pdf/statsum.pdf http://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/company/about_b...