3 ms·
You don't have to use his app, and he doesn't have to support users like you. It's a two-way thing: many developers don't want to support people that switch of
by lhnz 8y ago
You don't have to use his app, and he doesn't have to support users like you.
It's a two-way thing: many developers don't want to support people that switch off JavaScript, and these consumers are apparently happy that they can't access the majority of the internet (or so they say).
- yjftsjthsd-h 8y agoI think that's a slight misrepresentation; developers don't want to invest the (significant) effort to run without JS, and some end-users are unwilling to take the risks with allowing arbitrary code execution in their browser. But I doubt that developers (generally) don't want to support noscript; if it were 0 effort than I expect it would be common. And such users aren't happy that they can't access a lot of sites, they just find the tradeoffs unacceptable. That said, aside differing biases I'm not convinced that we actually disagree.