3 ms·
^^Very good point. On OSX with MacFuse and SSHFS, I've done plenty of remote work before on LAN servers and "internet" servers. It definitely works, but is slo
by askedrelic 16y ago
^^Very good point.
On OSX with MacFuse and SSHFS, I've done plenty of remote work before on LAN servers and "internet" servers. It definitely works, but is slow. But for being able to open up a "local" file in Vim/text editor and then save it, the only time you are hitting the network is during the save and that can be slow.
Transmit 4 integrated this functionality into their FTP client, auto-mounting of SSH connections, but it definitely seems more crashy than MacFuse to me.
- fragmede 16y agoIf remote editing vim is your only requirement, it should be noted that up-to-date versions of vim will handle scp://, as in "vim scp://hostname/file_to_edit". (Emacs users have Fish) (you should already have ssh keys setup)
- Nick_C 16y agoThanks for that. You've just removed 90% of my use cases for opening an actual shell on the remote server. I've been using vim for a decade or more. I guess it's a salutary lesson for experienced users. I should read the Changelog more carefully when upgrading.