3 ms·
Oh wow, they added that back. Bummer. It used to be SECTION 10: LIMITATION ON NON-HTML CACHING. [1] Then with the May 25, 2018 update to the terms [2] they rem
by Strom 8y ago
Oh wow, they added that back. Bummer.
It used to be SECTION 10: LIMITATION ON NON-HTML CACHING. [1] Then with the May 25, 2018 update to the terms [2] they removed that limitation. It has a section 2.7 Acceptable Use but no 2.8. Then they announced their Bandwidth Alliance on September 26, 2018 [3] offering some interesting free bandwidth options, including with places like backblaze which are primarily for storing non-html content. At the time of the announcement it seemed pretty mind blowing, especially because the non-html limitation had been removed previously. However it looks like they later updated their terms again on October 26, 2018 [4] to put back the limitation as section 2.8 Limitation on Non-HTML Caching.
Quite unfortunate. I was actually looking forward to using the bandwidth alliance benefit to access my B2 buckets, however looks like it's against the rules again.
--
[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20180413184130/https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/ https://web.archive.org/web/20180413184130/https://www.cloud...
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20181002020343/https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/ https://web.archive.org/web/20181002020343/https://www.cloud...
[3] https://blog.cloudflare.com/bandwidth-alliance/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/bandwidth-alliance/
[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20181102014745/https://www.cloudflare.com/terms/ https://web.archive.org/web/20181102014745/https://www.cloud...