3 ms·

From https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/12/attackers-deploy-new-ics-attack-framework-triton.html https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/201

From https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/12/attackers-deploy-new-ics-attack-framework-triton.html https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/12/attacke... >The targeting of critical infrastructure to disrupt, degrade, or destroy systems is consistent with numerous attack and reconnaissance activities carried out globally by Russian, Iranian, North Korean, U.S., and Israeli nation state actors. Intrusions of this nature do not necessarily indicate an immediate intent to disrupt targeted systems, and may be preparation for a contingency. This reeks of Stuxnet 2.0

tripplethrendo 8y ago
That was my thought exactly.
lifeisstillgood 8y ago
" We have your critical infrastructure by the balls, you have ours. We would both be MAD to trigger anything" Is that the planned situation here?
- marcotaves 8y ago
  In my opinion, wait on a secnd, or, like Alicia Florrick says with her american cute accent: Hold´ona´secon! enginners who build CRItical infrastructure dont add bluetooth and wifi and IoT internet of Threat <> on their machinery , right...unless I am mistaken...but... Many many many machinery comes with what they call Remote Troubleshooting with wifi conection, the machinery seller will tell you: With our system, we detect a problem in your machine from our office shop in Italy 6000 kilometers away from your factory where the machine is ^^^Before you yourself Detect it!!! ) so before the machine emergency stop right, without need to pay a blue bright stripped collar to babysit the machine wow this is cost wide yes? No , Stupid , it is stupid to put your machine is someones else control because if some kid in italy unintentionally play the mouse of uncles computer and the machine causes some worker to get scared and emergency stop all factory and maybe some worker get his hand hurt in the machine the your cost wise is Stupid Squared... In my opinion... thanks

tripplethrendo 8y ago

That was my thought exactly.

lifeisstillgood 8y ago

" We have your critical infrastructure by the balls, you have ours. We would both be MAD to trigger anything" Is that the planned situation here?

marcotaves 8y ago
In my opinion, wait on a secnd, or, like Alicia Florrick says with her american cute accent: Hold´ona´secon! enginners who build CRItical infrastructure dont add bluetooth and wifi and IoT internet of Threat <> on their machinery , right...unless I am mistaken...but... Many many many machinery comes with what they call Remote Troubleshooting with wifi conection, the machinery seller will tell you: With our system, we detect a problem in your machine from our office shop in Italy 6000 kilometers away from your factory where the machine is ^^^Before you yourself Detect it!!! ) so before the machine emergency stop right, without need to pay a blue bright stripped collar to babysit the machine wow this is cost wide yes? No , Stupid , it is stupid to put your machine is someones else control because if some kid in italy unintentionally play the mouse of uncles computer and the machine causes some worker to get scared and emergency stop all factory and maybe some worker get his hand hurt in the machine the your cost wise is Stupid Squared... In my opinion... thanks