3 ms·
As you say, most of the speculation seems to focus on MCAS in combination with faulty sensor data. While, as a layman, pilots being unfamiliar with MCAS seems l
by hencq 8y ago
As you say, most of the speculation seems to focus on MCAS in combination with faulty sensor data. While, as a layman, pilots being unfamiliar with MCAS seems like a reasonable explanation, doesn't this theory still require 2 planes in 6 months to have faulty AOA sensor data? That seems unusually high to me as well. I haven't really seen any comments on that.
- rootusrootus 8y agoIt does not seem too surprising to me. Sensors fail all the time on planes. The AOA sensor seems like a particularly good candidate for failure given the design. I think most people don't realize just how much stuff can be broken on an airliner and it still deemed safe to fly. And it happens all the time.
- bronson 8y agoI think you'll be surprised to see how long a typical MMEL is: http://fsims.faa.gov/wdocs/mmel/b-737%20r55a.pdf http://fsims.faa.gov/wdocs/mmel/b-737%20r55a.pdf Sure, airliners might fly all the time with a missing seat number or a broken overhead bin. They're big, complex machines. But if you're implying that it's routine to fly with broken sensors, then no. That's not true.