5 ms·
Apparently there are no more drug cartels to go after? We’re now worried about a has-been actress who paid $15,000 so her kid could cheat on the SAT? I’m skept
by mark212 8y ago
Apparently there are no more drug cartels to go after? We’re now worried about a has-been actress who paid $15,000 so her kid could cheat on the SAT?
I’m skeptical of the FBI’s investigative priorities. Wall Street is suddenly squeaky-clean? No more insider trading? Ponzi schemes have all gone away? Municipal governments across the land are staffed by honest and dedicated civil servants? All defense contractors are scrupulously precise about their billing and would never ever bribe a DOD procurement official?
I’m not saying it’s right to engage in cheating on the SAT or bribing someone to get into a university. But inarguably there are many more crimes that are far more serious.
- wyldfire 8y ago> Apparently there are no more drug cartels to go after? We’re now worried about a has-been actress who paid $15,000 so her kid could cheat on the SAT? This is a false dichotomy.
- nkrisc 8y agoAre you suggesting law enforcement for anything less than the most serious crimes should cease for as long as the more serious crimes continue?
- rconti 8y agoI think this is fantastic. I'd prefer law enforcement crack down on serious crimes of wide scope, as a punishment, as well as a deterrent for others who might wish to do the same. If all they did was go after the most heinous crimes, it would be immediately obvious that you can 'get away with' everything else.