4 ms·
It's not that there was no vote so much as there was no opposition, so not vote was needed to pass it. It's as if it passed unanimously. Although this happene
by cryptonector 8y ago
It's not that there was no vote so much as there was no opposition, so not vote was needed to pass it. It's as if it passed unanimously. Although this happened in a "nearly-empty plenary chamber", which makes one wonder about quorum -- did they have quorum?
- AnssiH 8y agoThere is no minimum requirement for plenary sessions. Looks like the majority of MPs were present at the beginning (list of absentees: https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/PoytakirjaLiite/Sivut/EDK-2019-AK-251781.aspx https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/PoytakirjaLiite/Sivut/EDK-... ), but the video shows that by the end (when voting happens) most people were not present anymore: https://www.eduskunta.fi/_layouts/15/Arkena.Edk.SaliVideo/index.html#clip_id=6021BB78&position=0&tab=ConferenceCurrent https://www.eduskunta.fi/_layouts/15/Arkena.Edk.SaliVideo/in...